Mendeleev arranged 63 elements known at that time in the periodic table. According to Mendeleev “the properties of the elements are a periodic function of their atomic masses.” The table consists of eight vertical column called ‘groups’ and horizontal rows called ‘periods’
Limitations of mendeleev’s classification :
(i) He could not assign a correct position of hydrogen in his periodic table, as the properties of hydrogen resembles both with alkali metals as well as with halogens.
(ii) The isotopes of the same element will be given different position if atomic number is taken as basis, which will disturb the symmetry of the periodic table.
(iii) The atomic masses do not increases in a regular manner in going from one elements to the next.
So it was not possible to predict how many elements could be discovered between two elements.
Best answer on Google
ReplyDeleteGet chemistry notes from here: Periodic Table | SEE | Chemistry Notes
DeleteThanks it is easy to understand
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteThanks it was really helpful and understanding
DeleteGet chemistry notes from here: Periodic Table | SEE Class 10 | Chemistry Notes
ReplyDeleteNice to store in mind
DeleteThanks Sir but I want the smallest papers link...of CBSE questions paper...
DeleteNiceee easy to learn
ReplyDeleteOk
DeleteThis is amazing
ReplyDeleteVery easy yr
ReplyDeleteVery confusing
DeleteYYYESSSSSSSSSSSS
DeleteIt is easy to understand
ReplyDeleteThe (ii) is wrong
ReplyDeleteIt should be atomic mass not atomic number.
Then what is the ans
DeleteItna common sense to khud legal
Deleteit is wrong and mr.unknown, you are right
DeleteThank uhh
ReplyDeleteIt is really useful
ReplyDeleteThank you
Really
DeleteThank you it makes easy to understand
ReplyDeleteNot so good but helpfull
DeleteNot so good but helpfull
DeleteTq very much
ReplyDeleteIn the second point, it is atomic mass and not atomic no.
ReplyDeleteYes you are correct.
DeleteActually that is right. What I was suggesting is that if we took atomic number as reference, then the isotopes will have a different position which can not be done with taking atomic mass as a reference.
DeleteThank u for the info
ReplyDeleteEasy to learn
ReplyDeleteThanks
it is easy to understand
ReplyDelete👍👍😊
ReplyDeletethanks
ReplyDeleteI think in (ii) there will be atomic mass not atomic no. Please clerify me
ReplyDeleteYes you are correct thanks
DeleteThanks for your hhelp
ReplyDeleteThanks
ReplyDeleteVery good explanations it is ...thank you
ReplyDeletenice
ReplyDeleteThanks for giving us nice concept
ReplyDeleteIn (ii) it is atomic mass not atomic number and overall answer is good and easy so i will give this anwer 4/5 one mark cut for point(ii)
ReplyDelete